![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think its perfectly fine to complain. Historically correct information is a crucial ingredient to this Hobby.
Without any basis of fact, anybody can say anything, build anything, and claim any type of fascinating BS story they want. Good thing there's many dedicated people in this hobby that are willing to do the necessary research to preserve automotive history. Continue kicking this unfounded story of a real 4-door Barracuda prototype seen at Chrysler's Headquarters in 1969 down the road, is the same as perpetuating a lie. Some people will see the car and unknowingly believe it was a part of Chryslers historical past - which would be a major dis-service to our hobby. Look at the efforts regarding the Norwood Pilot Camaro (a story which I followed closely). A tremendous amount of effort was put forth because people in our hobby deemed it important. We should always demand Historically CORRECT information. Research has to be put forth before a person can make any "extraordinary claims" about something. If the Norwood Pilot Camaro story was just a recollection of one person, without any evidence, every GM related website would have dismissed it as fictional. It's not up to me to prove anything. The burden of proof falls on the person making such claims. This entire Barracuda project was done with intent to misrepresent ...all the way down to the phony paperwork. Norwood pilot Camaro links: http://pilotcarregistry.com/pilot-program-overview.html http://pilotcarregistry.com/n100001.html |
|
|