Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Technical & Restoration


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-21-2004, 09:07 PM
tom406 tom406 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Newcastle, WA USA
Posts: 2,157
Thanks: 388
Thanked 3,570 Times in 764 Posts
Default Factory engine mis-stamp

It's always useful to see the factory inconsistencies before getting too bogged down in absolute "correctness".

I just had the privelege of looking over a really neat factory big block Chevelle, one-owner 40K miles. Engine code matches the POP, but the serial number stamping is just "7Z1317", whereas the VIN of the car is ".....7Z1318xx". I can just hear the guy doing the stamping cursing when he hit the 7, then sending it on down the line, never knowing the turmoil he'd inflicted on the collector car hobby 35 years later.

Has anyone seen anything similar? Of all the cars for this to happen to, its a shame it had to be on a survivor, rather than one of the thousands to grenade its motor within the first year. The car is so honest I don't see how a serious collector could deduct value for this, but opposing views are welcome for discussion.
Reply With Quote
Click here to view all the pictures posted in this thread...
  #2  
Old 08-21-2004, 09:33 PM
Mr70's Avatar
Mr70 Mr70 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 20,926
Thanks: 70
Thanked 3,553 Times in 1,436 Posts
Default Re: Factory engine mis-stamp

It's been seen before,and not just on Chevrolet cars.
Humans built em,Humans make mistakes.
If this example happens to be on a "SIRVYVAR,(Take that Bloomington Gold ),Like you say,then all its other original details would also underscore it's credibility.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-22-2004, 01:44 AM
Tim Greer Tim Greer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: California.
Posts: 93
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Factory engine mis-stamp

Are you sure it wasn't a _machine_ stamping the numbers, and not a person actually manually typing them in, making that 'typo' scenario less likely?
__________________
--
I'm a nobody.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-22-2004, 06:24 PM
olredalert olredalert is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Marine City, Mi.
Posts: 9,425
Thanks: 32,973
Thanked 4,549 Times in 1,930 Posts
Default Re: Factory engine mis-stamp

-----Pad stampings were not machine generated! They were done by humans. Often they used gang-type holders so the stampings were uniform but some assembly areas didnt use them at various times so they appear as if a child stamped them. Often, this is reason enough to take an expert along with you for the purchase. I also have seen many instances of human error in this particular area. GM was and is a huge corporation and things varied from plant to plant, sometimes widely............Bill S
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-23-2004, 05:15 PM
L34Pace L34Pace is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Seymour, IN.
Posts: 96
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Factory engine mis-stamp

I own a 67SS 350 that has a similar issue. Last digit in the partial vin is 6 and actual vin digit should be 9. The digit was inserted in the gang stamp upside down! Mistakes do happen. I feel that documentation is a cumaltive process of evaluating a variety of available known bench marks.
Pat
__________________
Pat Railsback
67 0-1 Camaro L35/M40/3.07
68 RS/SS Camaro L78/M22/4.56
69 Z11 Camaro L34/M20/3.73
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-23-2004, 07:22 PM
Verne_Frantz Verne_Frantz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 3,793
Thanks: 34
Thanked 240 Times in 123 Posts
Default Re: Factory engine mis-stamp

Tom,
I've documented an original '63 Impala SS Sport Coupe built at St. Louis with it's original 2x4 409 and Muncie trans. The VIN stamp on the block matches the car's VIN, but the stamp on the trans is 7 digits off. The odds against this trans being from another car, and somehow finding it's way onto this car years later are too high to believe that could have happened.
Unless the dealer had ordered two cars at the same time, lost the trans in one of them due to an overzealous test ride, then swaped transmissions to sell the car, I'd have to believe the switch (or mistake) happened at St. Louis.
It's my understanding that the trans was already bolted to the engine when the VIN was stamped on both the engine and the trans, but perhaps, the two different VINs were stamped on the trannys while they were still on the pallet, and the wrong one got bolted up. I'm sure no "end of the line" inspector bothered to crawl under the car to check for that.

Verne.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-23-2004, 09:57 PM
Jeff H Jeff H is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 2,454
Thanks: 0
Thanked 80 Times in 24 Posts
Default Re: Factory engine mis-stamp

I was under the impression that the engine and tranmission would be stamped at the same time so they both should have the mis-stamping the same. I've seen a COPO M22 transmission that was stamped off by 1 digit. I would check the transmission and see if it's the exact same stamping as the engine.
__________________
69 Z28 JL8, #'s match - being restored
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-24-2004, 05:19 AM
NCGuy68 NCGuy68 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: N. Carolina, Wake Co.
Posts: 677
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Factory engine mis-stamp

On my numbers match 68RS/Z28 Van Nuys built car:

1. The Trans. VIN stamped number is 338806.
2. The Engine VIN stamped number is 338808.
3. The Body VIN is 338808.

All other numbers line up and seem to be correct. I consider the mis-stamp on the Trans. to be a legitimate factory error and I've seen others.


All other stamped/casting numbers line up.
__________________
Craig S.
"I saw Elvis At 1000 Feet"
John Force.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-25-2004, 10:06 PM
Tim Greer Tim Greer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: California.
Posts: 93
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Factory engine mis-stamp

I had no idea--and never had to deal with that issue/problem myself. How can someone really know or have a good idea in such cases?
__________________
--
I'm a nobody.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-26-2004, 05:05 AM
ohhawk ohhawk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Iowa
Posts: 430
Thanks: 3
Thanked 68 Times in 19 Posts
Default Re: Factory engine mis-stamp

I owned a very original 1967 Chevelle SS (396/350) that had the same issue as yourself. All #'s matched except the last digit of the serial # was off by one (last digit) like your situation. I posted a similar inquiry as your own on the Team Chevelle site a couple years ago and received a couple of responses indicating they had seen this or knew of a car in the same situation.
__________________
Dick
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.