Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
#71
|
|||
|
|||
|
With Dale's permission, I am posting a link to his older site with a multitude of information on Transmissions and tags. Most tag information at the bottom of the page. Hope this helps:
http://chevellestuff.net/qd/muncie.htm Paul
__________________
[email protected] |
| The Following User Says Thank You to fsc66 For This Useful Post: | ||
68L71 (02-01-2022) | ||
|
#72
|
||||
|
||||
|
3950318 XH. late 69 M22?
__________________
Ebay Auctions http://www.ebay.com/sch/427-king/m.h...=16&_rdc=1 No Fisher priced toys here |
|
#73
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's listed on the first 69 internal code list to come out May of 68.
__________________
381 and counting in the 67-69 Impala SS427 registry |
|
#74
|
||||
|
||||
|
My 67 L78 has a Muncie M21 with Tag #3879668.
__________________
Steve Shauger The Supercar Registry www.yenko.net or www.thesupercarregistry.com Vintage Certification™ , Providing Recognition to Unrestored Muscle Cars. Website: www.vintagecertification.com |
|
#75
|
||||
|
||||
|
68 Chevelle L35 M20 first 4 pics.
69 Chevelle L78 M22last 2 pics |
|
#76
|
||||
|
||||
|
I didn't see this one on the list. It's a '69 M21. What does the tag tell?
__________________
Freddie 1969 Camaro RS/SS396 (427) 4 speed |
| The Following User Says Thank You to big gear head For This Useful Post: | ||
olredalert (11-02-2025) | ||
|
#77
|
|||
|
|||
|
The 3857578 M20 tag is not correct for Z16.
It’s rare, used for 65 Chevelle with 3.70 (RPO G75, 96 units) or 3.73 (RPO H05, 293 units) and 1965 Nova with 3.55 (RPO G96, 120 units). 3857577 is a common M20 tag - correct for Z16. Z16 was originally supposed to get 3.55 or 3.73 but ended up with only 3.31 open carrier. Apparently Posi units were hard to come by in at least part of the 1965 model year. There were 2 designs for Posi in 1965. The first version apparently wasn’t that good. But the later version was used after that from 1965-72. Thanks to several people (Jeff H. Warren L. and others) for helping me figure this out. Last edited by bcmiller; Yesterday at 09:17 AM. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to bcmiller For This Useful Post: | ||
olredalert (Yesterday) | ||
|
#78
|
|||
|
|||
|
For sake of completeness, below is the message I received, and my entire reply. I did fail to include G75 3.70 10-bolt ElCaminos in that reply though, so I have added that in [brackets] below. Thanks!
Quote:
All Z16's came with the 577 transmission. The 578 part number was initially listed in the AIM as for Z16 (which is why is shows up on many internet lists), but that designation was cancelled and changed to 577 on 11-18-64, which was long before any of the Z16 cars were built. 577 is just a regular 65 Chevelle M20 which has the internal speedo drive gear for a 3.31 or higher (numerically lower) rear axle gear. All Z16's had a 3.31 open axle, so the 577 M20 is what they all got. The 578 p/n is not found in any parts books to definitively say what it was. But my belief is that it is a 65 Chevelle M20 with the internal speedo drive gear for a 3.55 or lower (numerically higher) rear axle gear. While 3.55's and 3.73's were not available as RPO's in 65 Chevelle coupes, sedans and wagons, [a 3.70 was an available RPO in a 65 ElCamino with a 195HP or 220HP 283; and] a 3.73 was an available RPO in a 65 ElCamino with a 250HP or 300HP 327; and there was also a COPO number to get a 3.73 gear behind an L79; either of which would have necessitated that there be a different M20 transmission unit (with a different part number) that had the correct speedo drive gear inside of it for that axle gear. Again, I believe that was the 578 M20 transmission. Based on the AIM notations and change dates, my belief is that the Z16 was originally intended to receive a 3.55 or 3.73 posi rear axle (which would have required the correct 578 M20 transmission); but due to inability to get any posi units at the time that those 200 axles were to be built, they downgraded to the 3.31 open gear that all Z16's actually came with. That change in turn resulted in cancelling the 578 M20 p/n designation for Z16 in the AIM, and reverting to the regular 577 M20 unit (which matches a 3.31 gear). It is also notable that the Z16 page in the AIM where the rear axle part number is listed was redrawn and redesigned on 11-19-64, the day after the transmission p/n change, so that supports the conclusion that the two changes were interconnected. So you can tell the guy that he still has a quite rare tag -- records indicate that there were only [80 M20 3.70 ElCaminos built (the other 16 were 3-speeds and powerglides), and] 225 M20 3.73 ElCaminos built [the other 68 were 3-speeds], plus however many of the COPO L79/M20 3.73 combos were built, which is probably only a handfull. But it is definitively NOT a Z16 transmission tag. Jeff
__________________
Jeff Helms 65 Z16 Survivor 65 Z16 drag car 66 Chevelle L78 unrestored 67 Chevelle L78 unrestored 67 Camaro SS350 Survivor Last edited by jeffschevelle; Yesterday at 06:04 AM. |
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jeffschevelle For This Useful Post: | ||
olredalert (Yesterday), Steve Shauger (Yesterday) | ||
|
#79
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks Jeff.
There is a post earlier in this thread that mentions the 3857578 tag. That’s my reason for posting in this thread. That part number was also listed in a FACILITIES & PRODUCTION PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING SECTION publication for Z16 use. But as you said, was later removed in the AIM. And it’s not just a Chevelle (El Camino) tag. Used on a small number of Novas too. Last edited by bcmiller; Yesterday at 09:16 AM. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to bcmiller For This Useful Post: | ||
olredalert (Yesterday) | ||
![]() |
|
|