Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Pit Area - Racing


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-27-2005, 04:18 AM
VintageMusclecar's Avatar
VintageMusclecar VintageMusclecar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,369
Thanks: 187
Thanked 187 Times in 49 Posts
Default F.A.S.T. questions

Asking purely hypothetical questions, of course...

Say someone were to contemplate building a `67 L78. The OEM heads are casting # 3904391, the carb is a #3910 and the intake is a #3885069. All rather expensive items in comparison to their more common 840, 4346 (et.al.) and 163 bretheren.

Would 840 heads, 4346 carbs (or any other similar design 780 GM carb) and a 163 intake be legal substitutes?

Next question: Did the F40 HD suspension option on `67's include a rear sway bar? If so, are aftermarket replacements legal? Do they have to be OEM diamater?

Last question (for now, anyhow);

F70/14's were an option on `67's. Do I understand correctly that a G70/14 is an acceptable upgrade, as long as the original 14X6 rim is maintained?

Thanks!

Eric
Reply With Quote
Click here to view all the pictures posted in this thread...
  #2  
Old 10-27-2005, 04:37 AM
Chevy454 Chevy454 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alton, MO, USA
Posts: 11,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: F.A.S.T. questions

I *think* you'd be ok on the carb, but I think you're gonna need the right # on the heads/intake. And the sway bar...I'm not up on the early a-bodys, but on the later ones it took the F41 option to get the rear sway bar...but if you could get a rear bar on a '67, you can use it...and yes, you can upgrade to a G series tire.

Big dog or John Brown...did I miss anything?

And here's a link to the FAST page, with rules:
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-27-2005, 05:30 AM
John Brown's Avatar
John Brown John Brown is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Bend, Indiana
Posts: 2,820
Thanks: 455
Thanked 511 Times in 243 Posts
Default Re: F.A.S.T. questions

Eric, I'm not the one you really need to the answer those questions. Personally I'd be a little more of a stickler on the parts than Rob since the carbs may be available repopped from Holley (or service dated and much cheaper), and the manifolds are available if you look daily on e-bay.

edit: rules now say stamp # on carb doesn't need to be correct if the carb appears externally correct.

The carb is a bunch small so you might want to find a shop that can massage the insides to make it flow a bit ( like 900 cfm) better too. Heads are another story. If they are flat not available and another casting # offers no performance advantage an exception <u>might</u> be made.

Look here for the F.A.S.T. rules.

F.A.S.T. rules

Sign up over there if you want to ask the guys that have final say if you can run the parts you are asking about.

F.A.S.T Questions

The G70x14's are ok, and if a rear sway bar was available in 66 I don't think anyone is going to measure it. Front sway bar is optional.

Hope you can see your way to building a 66 SS car. Those coil spring cars can really hook and a 66 is the lightest one available with a big block except for a 65 Z-16.
__________________
......................
John Brown

This isn't rocket surgery.....
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-27-2005, 06:47 AM
VintageMusclecar's Avatar
VintageMusclecar VintageMusclecar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,369
Thanks: 187
Thanked 187 Times in 49 Posts
Default Re: F.A.S.T. questions

Thanks for the quick response(s).

AFAIK, the 840 heads are essentially the same as the 391's...both square port closed chamber heads with 2.19/1.72 valves. I *think* the only significant differences have to do with which heads are drilled for temp senders, but I'm not 100% sure on that.

Just considering the cost of the 391's since they're so rare. Then to tweak them for performance use essentially destroys the re-sale value. Same thing goes for the 163 intake vs. the 069.

The carb size is no big deal. 780 cfm is plenty once the fuel curve is right.

Just kicking around some ideas right now, wondering what the options were.

Much obliged gentlemen.

Eric
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-27-2005, 06:54 AM
Chevy454 Chevy454 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alton, MO, USA
Posts: 11,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: F.A.S.T. questions

Might even give Pure Stock a thought...you've got potentially got a tasty little combo there...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-27-2005, 07:09 AM
John Brown's Avatar
John Brown John Brown is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Bend, Indiana
Posts: 2,820
Thanks: 455
Thanked 511 Times in 243 Posts
Default Re: F.A.S.T. questions

How about a 325/350 horse version (hydraulic roller?) of the same car? That should really cut the costs down.

It was available with a turbo 400. Might see a big difference in the 60' times over a 4-speed. The ovals are supposed to flow pretty well. Gessler can even port that cast iron intake to make it lighter. Can replace the trans with any GM automatic in F.A.S.T.
__________________
......................
John Brown

This isn't rocket surgery.....
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.