|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
1968 Z on BAt
Does this car have any Legit stamps, or reason to think it is an original Z ? Even has the glove box sticker, (but I would assume they make that sticker by now)
VIN :124378N363473 https://bringatrailer.com/listing/19...-camaro-z28-7/
__________________
1969 Z/28 Garnet Red Unrestored 46k original miles looking for- some original spiral shocks (3192851) & (3192477) - Y77 Side post battery - original LOF softray windshield - Negative side post battery cable (6297651 AV) *also looking for DZ block w/vin 9L503829 124379L503829 |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Sure sounds Good !
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I would love to own that car; looks and sounds great to me.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Good looking car, real Z? To many red flags for me.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Such as? I am interested to learn what you see that is of concern.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I would point to the utter lack of plausible broach marks on the pad and the fact that all the character stamps look like they were done one at a time and not in a gang. JMO.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Yes, my thought exactly. Also non original trans, another set of numbers “missing” for comparison.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Yes that pad is a restamp. Comparing a May stamping with a Dec stamping is also not a sure way of authenticating. I like to compare it to same day stampings or other December stampings. There are differences.
__________________
1969 Camaro RS/SS Azure Turquoise 1969 Camaro Z/28 Azure Turquoise 1984 Camaro z/28 L69 HO 5 speed 1984 Camaro z/28 zz4 conversion 1987 Monte Carlo SS original owner |
The Following User Says Thank You to Jonesy For This Useful Post: | ||
BULLITT65 (12-13-2021) |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Up to $37K now. A decent price for a clone still.
|
|
|