1965 gto

[60sStuff]

This car needs to be corrected in a lot of areas, but worth it.

Excellent options!
https://www.ebay.com/itm/205733758723

[Bill Pritchard]

Nice looking car. I think the passenger side muffler is on backwards....looks like the arrow with the word "INLET" is pointing to the rear

[olredalert]

----Yank the air-shocks right away and then call Gardner for complete (splitter) exhaust, and I would only piddle with stuff after that....Bill S

[66cayne]

great looking car but the ad is slightly deceiving. They state it's 365hp tripower engine as documented through the PHS document but never state if it's the original engine and trans. So, I don't think you can call it a survivor, especially with a repaint in the 70s but it certainly has plenty of wow factor especially with that gold interior.

[60sStuff]

Originally Posted by 66cayne

great looking car but the ad is slightly deceiving. They state it's 365hp tripower engine as documented through the PHS document but never state if it's the original engine and trans. So, I don't think you can call it a survivor, especially with a repaint in the 70s but it certainly has plenty of wow factor especially with that gold interior.

New photos have been uploaded showing engine components.
WS = Tri-Power (360 HP), manual shift.
Block date = very close to build date.
Cylinder heads #77 = ‘65 GTO.

No, this is not a Survivor as advertised as it does not have factory paint.
Still don’t know if transmission and rear end are born with ?
Power brakes were recommended on cars with metallic brakes such as this car.
At some point the Power Steering was added as it’s not noted on the PHS Billing Card or the Window Sticker.

If this car is a legit matching numbers GTO it would be a highly sought after example because of all the performance options noted.

PS, One year only (1965 GTO W/3x2) HD 4 row radiator with filler neck on RH side with matching fan guard.

[scuncio]

Nice colors and performance options.