![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Corvette was never a muscle car because you could never bring your family/friends in it.
Muscle cars = 4 seats... What do you guys think? I refer to our Corvettes as Classic Cars, never Muscle Cars.
__________________
Follow me on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mbcgarage/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Guess I always think of a muscle car as more the standard passenger car with a corvette motor..
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They always tended to be stuck in the sports car category but didn't fit. Corvettes and Cobras were in a class of their own. They didn't really fit in with the English or the European cars. Some sure had the muscle though. The new 427 is no exception. Anything that will run mid elevens on street tires is a musclecar in my books. Beare Motors sold an L88 Vette in '69. I heard it running and the car had MUSCLECAR written all over it. My old 427 sounded pretty tame by comparison.
![]()
__________________
Chevelleless after 46 years......but we did find a low mileage, six speed, silver 2005 Corvette. It will just have to do for now. ![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sports car.
![]() ![]() |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here's the Webster definition;
Main Entry: muscle car Pronunciation: -"kär Function: noun : any of a group of American-made 2-door sports coupes with powerful engines designed for high-performance driving
__________________
I like real cars best...especially the REAL real ones! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I believe a Corvette that is fitted with the biggest, most powerful engine can be considered a musclecar. A 1971 ZQ3 engined Corvette would not be (350cid/270hp), but a 425hp/454cid) LS-6 engined 1971 Corvette definitely is. Nobody here would say the standard 6cyl 1969 Camaro qualifies, but a COPO 427cid would. I just gave examples of the least powerful and most powerful engines of each model.
__________________
2 1971 LS-6 Corvette coupes (Duntov's last stand) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think from 65 to 70 I would consider them muscle cars. How did some of the big block camaro's match up to the corvettes back in the day?... Any first hand experiences.
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
whenever the 2 seat debate comes up people tend to refer to them as sports cars. however, an AMX is also a 2 seater from 68-70 and it really isn't a sports car. i generally say that any vehicle built with high performance in mind is a musclecar. a 87 buick GNX is a modern musclecar. a 66 4 door hemi coronet is a musclecar. a 2001 Roush Stage III is modern musclecar. as is a 61 409 impala. now the real debate is whether a 350/300 70 nova is? we all know a 396/375 L89 is. where is the cut off?
__________________
Founder of Lost Muscle Cars Discovered; 1968 Dick Harrell L88 Super Chevelle, 1969 Ford Boss Bronco, 1969 KK1201 Boss 429 Prototype, 1964 Savoy 426 Max Wedge (steel nose), 1969 Nova L78 Yenko Sold |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think you'd almost have to come up with some sort of a power to weight ratio minimum. (Try to get everyone to agree on that one).
I think each era had their own musclecars of the day. In the late '70's early '80's a Trans Am was a musclecar even though it really wasn't that powerful or that fast. It's a tough question with many different opinions. |
![]() |
|
|