![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I was just reading one of the threads that mentioned the 4.10 axle ratio in 70 for solid lifter Camaros. Prior to 1970 could you get a performance ratio with a non-solid lifter engine?? eg; L34 Chevelle with a 4.10 or steeper rear or were there restrictions??
wilma
__________________
02 Berger 380hp #95 Lots of L78 Novas Join National Nostalgic Nova! 70 Orange Cooler 69 Camaro |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My info is specific to 1969 chevelles but I looked at my 1969 Chevelle Protect o Plate list and found two, one with a 325 hp manual engine and one with a 350 HP engine and they had hydraulic lifters. I would think you could have ordered it as an option on any Chevelle if you were willing to pay for it. According to the reference image I have (Bow Ties and Tail Fins), for 1969 Chevelle options, there were 6250 of the 4.10 option for 1969 chevelles. The 4.10 gear required posi-traction and cost was $56.90 and included a heavy duty radiator, same as the 3.73 gears as listed in the Chevrolet Motor Vehicle Price Schedule. take care, Andy
__________________
Andy Team Chevelle #3135 ACES #08305 1969 Chevelle Trim Tag Research (On-going) |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think 1970 saw a new ratio allowance on certain engines,do to thier increasing Horsepower and possible warranty concerns too.
1969 Chevelle,Elcamino w/<span style="text-decoration: underline">L-35</span> 325HP engine,w/o Air Conditioning & equipped w/3spd. & 4spd. trans. could get the 3:73 posi or 4:10 posi for extra cost.Neither ratio was possible with a TH400 trans. Only the 3:73 was possible for an extra cost,(No 4:10),on those when A/C equipped,but only when equipped with the 2.52:1 low 4spd. Chevelles equipped w/<span style="text-decoration: underline">L-34</span> 350HP engine w/o A/C,and ANY transmission,could get the 3:73 posi or 4:10 posi for an additional cost. Only the 3:73 was possible for an extra cost,(No 4:10),on those when A/C equipped. <span style="text-decoration: underline">L-78</span> 375HP engine Chevelle & Elco could get an extra cost 3:73 posi or 4:10 posi with the TH400 or when any M/T ratio was ordered.A/C was not possible on this engine. I have a list for all the other 1969 vehicles,including Corvair,but didn't know if you wanted those or just the Chevelle. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
What about the steeper gears like 4.56 or 4.88...would these have been restricted to the solid lifter cars in 68-69??
I was aware of the 1970 limitations...too many CE motors in the past [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/rolleyes.gif[/img] Did the same rules apply to other GM divisions?? I think there were some pretty steep ratios available on the Pontiac, Olds and Buick performance cars...and none of those were solid lifter. wilma
__________________
02 Berger 380hp #95 Lots of L78 Novas Join National Nostalgic Nova! 70 Orange Cooler 69 Camaro |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: WILMASBOYL78</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Prior to 1970 could you get a performance ratio with a non-solid lifter engine????
wilma </div></div> I had a 4.10/M20 in a L48 Camaro I restored back in the mid 90's. Confirmed by POP. It would make sense the same would be available for a L48 69 Chevelle.
__________________
Specialized Chevrolet Decals |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
An L-48 '69 Camaro could have gotten the 3:73 posi or 4:10 posi for an extra cost when it came with either a 3spd. or 4spd. only.
But the L-48 equipped '69 Chevelle could not,and was only allowed the 3:08,3:36 or 3:55 posi.as an upgrade depending on the trans ordered. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Good stuff Rick.
__________________
Specialized Chevrolet Decals |
![]() |
|
|