![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community ![]() |
Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools
![]() |
Display Modes
![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This looks fake to me, but I just want to make sure. Your thoughts? It's in a supposedly #'s matching 69 RS/Z28.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why do you thinks its fake? It would be nice to see the entire pad bare but it looks good to me. The short leg on the bottom of the Z is definitely a good sign.
Jason |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My concern was the alignment of the vin numbers and the very close proximity of the vin stamp and engine I'd stamp. How about the space between the "V" and the "1"? Maybe it is fine, I am just looking for other opinions. I didn't realize the lower leg of the Z was a good sign. Car has pop, but starting with block basics first.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here are 69 and 70 Van Nuys stamped small block pads for comparison.
![]() ![]() Jason |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: musclecar fan</div><div class="ubbcode-body">My concern was the alignment of the vin numbers and the very close proximity of the vin stamp and engine I'd stamp. How about the space between the "V" and the "1"? Maybe it is fine, I am just looking for other opinions. I didn't realize the lower leg of the Z was a good sign. Car has pop, but starting with block basics first. </div></div>
All normal, buy it |
![]() |
|
|