![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Everyone
Rebuilding my stock 302 with all the original parts, pink rods, 1178 crank, 0 rockers, 11-1 stock pistons, single DZ carb etc etc. Can I use the 1st design off road cam #3927140 in this stock engine for street use with 410 rear. Can I still use pump gas 94 And is it possible to have a vacuum problem at all? Thanks very much in advance for your help. Ken |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My JL8 has that same cam seems to work fine I actually like the bleed with the overlap seems to be a bit of a ease with the comp ht. with pump gas, no ping brakes work great!!
![]()
__________________
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In the mid 70's I built an LT1 with that cam and had it in a 69 Camaro with power disc brakes. Had no lack of vacuum for the brakes, so you should be fine.
__________________
Bill Pritchard 73 Camaro RS Z28, L82, M20, C60 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A guy on camaros.net just put one in his car along with headers and he loves it. It really sounds strong in his video. I think he has a gardeners chambered exhaust too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WTgT0VCytGc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXK-lTkRXBY
__________________
Andy 1967 Camaro 406 4 speed 1969 C/10 383 5 speed 1969 D300 318 4 speed 1969 Super Bee 383 4 speed 1972 K/5 350 Turbo 350 1972 Duster 340 727 1974 'Cuda 340 4 speed |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
4:10's may be a little tough to pull out with the car. Unless the trans was a M20 box. I would go to 4:56's with an M20 box and that car would be mean. Also I like pressed in wrist pins. A little safer and it doesn't have much, if anything to do with performance. 302's are all about proper gearing. We already know how much they rev!
![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My brother had a stock, except for the off road cam, 70 1/2 Z-28. 4 speed, 4.10 gear. It was fine with power brakes, had a great sounding idle, but 4.56 gears would have been better with that cam.
__________________
Steve |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree, a steeper gear would be better...I had 4.88's in my 69 Camaro.
__________________
Bill Pritchard 73 Camaro RS Z28, L82, M20, C60 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Now we are talking. On a sb chevy most people play under the hood instead of playing under the back end!
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thats the cam i put in my 302 back in 1990,its been foulen plugs ever sence,turns out that was a good thing because i never drove it.just wondering if the primary jets is the cause of the engine running so ritch..
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I ran that cam in my 302 for a number of years and loved it. Never had a detonation problem using pump gas premium but it did tend to foul plugs. I drove this car as a daily driver and would change plugs about every 1000-2000 miles. No vacuum problems at all. My engine was stock other than headers and the cam, and I was running 4.10 gears. I think 4.10 gears were great with that engine. Best to run 302s with a 4-series gear. I don't think you should run the 140 cam without headers. Chevrolet certainly did not recommend it back in the day. Is that what you are considering?
-Jon |
![]() |
|
|