Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Technical & Restoration


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-30-2009, 05:50 AM
cdn454LS6 cdn454LS6 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 835
Thanks: 4
Thanked 46 Times in 33 Posts
Default 1st design off road cam #3927140 Vacuum Issue?

Hi Everyone
Rebuilding my stock 302 with all the original parts, pink rods, 1178 crank, 0 rockers, 11-1 stock pistons, single DZ carb etc etc.
Can I use the 1st design off road cam #3927140 in this stock engine for street use with 410 rear.
Can I still use pump gas 94 And is it possible to have a vacuum problem at all?
Thanks very much in advance for your help.
Ken
Reply With Quote
Click here to view all the pictures posted in this thread...
  #2  
Old 04-30-2009, 06:27 AM
beater68427 beater68427 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 577
Thanks: 5
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 1st design off road cam #3927140 Vacuum Issue?

My JL8 has that same cam seems to work fine I actually like the bleed with the overlap seems to be a bit of a ease with the comp ht. with pump gas, no ping brakes work great!!


__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-01-2009, 08:50 AM
Bill Pritchard Bill Pritchard is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Valley of the Sun, AZ
Posts: 6,211
Thanks: 1,529
Thanked 1,825 Times in 875 Posts
Default Re: 1st design off road cam #3927140 Vacuum Issue?

In the mid 70's I built an LT1 with that cam and had it in a 69 Camaro with power disc brakes. Had no lack of vacuum for the brakes, so you should be fine.
__________________
Bill Pritchard

73 Camaro RS Z28, L82, M20, C60
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-01-2009, 09:00 AM
Andy Andy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Cleveland, Georgia
Posts: 403
Thanks: 149
Thanked 201 Times in 63 Posts
Default Re: 1st design off road cam #3927140 Vacuum Issue?

A guy on camaros.net just put one in his car along with headers and he loves it. It really sounds strong in his video. I think he has a gardeners chambered exhaust too.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WTgT0VCytGc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXK-lTkRXBY
__________________
Andy
1967 Camaro 406 4 speed
1969 C/10 383 5 speed
1969 D300 318 4 speed
1969 Super Bee 383 4 speed
1972 K/5 350 Turbo 350
1972 Duster 340 727
1974 'Cuda 340 4 speed
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-01-2009, 02:46 PM
Salvatore Salvatore is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 9,908
Thanks: 3
Thanked 229 Times in 193 Posts
Default Re: 1st design off road cam #3927140 Vacuum Issue?

4:10's may be a little tough to pull out with the car. Unless the trans was a M20 box. I would go to 4:56's with an M20 box and that car would be mean. Also I like pressed in wrist pins. A little safer and it doesn't have much, if anything to do with performance. 302's are all about proper gearing. We already know how much they rev!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-01-2009, 06:54 PM
Steven J Steven J is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Illinois
Posts: 500
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default Re: 1st design off road cam #3927140 Vacuum Issue?

My brother had a stock, except for the off road cam, 70 1/2 Z-28. 4 speed, 4.10 gear. It was fine with power brakes, had a great sounding idle, but 4.56 gears would have been better with that cam.
__________________
Steve

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-01-2009, 10:56 PM
Bill Pritchard Bill Pritchard is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Valley of the Sun, AZ
Posts: 6,211
Thanks: 1,529
Thanked 1,825 Times in 875 Posts
Default Re: 1st design off road cam #3927140 Vacuum Issue?

I agree, a steeper gear would be better...I had 4.88's in my 69 Camaro.
__________________
Bill Pritchard

73 Camaro RS Z28, L82, M20, C60
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-01-2009, 11:10 PM
Salvatore Salvatore is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 9,908
Thanks: 3
Thanked 229 Times in 193 Posts
Default Re: 1st design off road cam #3927140 Vacuum Issue?

Now we are talking. On a sb chevy most people play under the hood instead of playing under the back end!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-03-2009, 07:34 PM
70 ls6 convert 70 ls6 convert is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: ketchikan alaska
Posts: 146
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 1st design off road cam #3927140 Vacuum Issue?

Thats the cam i put in my 302 back in 1990,its been foulen plugs ever sence,turns out that was a good thing because i never drove it.just wondering if the primary jets is the cause of the engine running so ritch..
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-04-2009, 12:01 AM
1967Z28's Avatar
1967Z28 1967Z28 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Golden Bear State, USA
Posts: 2,171
Thanks: 1,984
Thanked 1,391 Times in 520 Posts
Default Re: 1st design off road cam #3927140 Vacuum Issue

I ran that cam in my 302 for a number of years and loved it. Never had a detonation problem using pump gas premium but it did tend to foul plugs. I drove this car as a daily driver and would change plugs about every 1000-2000 miles. No vacuum problems at all. My engine was stock other than headers and the cam, and I was running 4.10 gears. I think 4.10 gears were great with that engine. Best to run 302s with a 4-series gear. I don't think you should run the 140 cam without headers. Chevrolet certainly did not recommend it back in the day. Is that what you are considering?

-Jon
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.