|
|
|
#1
05-18-2005, 12:21 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Possible COPO?
__________________
Marlin 70 Yenko Nova-350/360, 4speed M21, 4.10 Posi (Daddy's Ride) 69 SS Nova-396/375hp, 4speed M20, 3.55 Posi (Benjamin's Ride) 67 RS Camaro-327/250hp, 2speed Glide, & 3.08 Open (Danny's Ride) 
|
|
#2
05-18-2005, 12:34 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Possible COPO?
Hmmm.. SS hood, bowtie, interesting. Funny on another thread we are talking about a unaccounted silver DH Camaro. Is that silver.
 Would be nice if someone could get the VIN on that one...
__________________
1969 Z28 1972 Corvette
|
|
#4
05-18-2005, 12:52 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Possible COPO?
Yea if you look at the picture closely it has Cragar SS wheels as well.
__________________
~JAG~ NCRS#65120 68 GTO HO 4 spd Alpine Blue /Parchment 2 owner car #21783 71 Corvette LT1 45k miles Orig paint - Brandshatch Green - National Top Flight - last known 71 LT1 built. 71 Corvette LT1 42k miles Original paint - Black - black leather - only black LT1 known to exist. NUMEROUS Lemans blue Camaros, Monza Red and Daytona Yellow Corvettes & a Chevelle or two... Survivors, restored cars, & other photos https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/myphotos
|
|
#6
05-18-2005, 09:04 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Possible COPO?
I thought that the point of the ZL2 hood was to accomadate the higher clearance of the 427 with high rise intake, which is why they were standard on all COPO's. I don't recall ever seeing even a dealer swap 427 with the flat hood. Too bad you can't really see the engine call out on the fenders. Doesn't look to me like the 6 cylinder fender that was standard on COPO's.
 Andy
__________________
 COPO 9561/9737 M40 X11D80 13.37 @ 105.50 on pump gas,drove it to NATL TRAILS and back [email protected] SCR22
|
|
#7
05-18-2005, 09:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Possible COPO?
The ZL2 hood and related air cleaner items was an RPO performance option (standard on Z11's) that was included as part of the 9561/9560 COPO package. The L72 motor required no more hood clearance than an L78 equipped Camaro with an SS hood using the standard open element air cleaner. A true flat hood (I'm pretty sure, recalling the olden days) would also work on either of these installed motors using the open element air cleaner.
|
|
#8
05-18-2005, 10:20 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Possible COPO?
The ZL2 was developed to go with the ZL1, hence the RPO #.
Once it became an RPO, it could be ordered on any SS or Z28, after Jan. '69. I know that the 396 came with a flat hood, but since all COPO's came with the ZL2 hood, it would be easy to assume that there was a clearance issue. The car in question has an SS hood, and the question is "Possible COPO?"
__________________
COPO 9561/9737 M40 X11D80 13.37 @ 105.50 on pump gas,drove it to NATL TRAILS and back [email protected] SCR22
|
|
#9
05-18-2005, 10:35 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Possible COPO?
[ QUOTE ]
The ZL2 was developed to go with the ZL1, hence the RPO #. [/ QUOTE ] Then carried over to the 1970-72 SS Chevelle & dubbed,"COWL INDUCTION". Thank You Vince Piggens! 
|
|
#10
05-19-2005, 03:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Possible COPO?
Your inquiry was:
[ QUOTE ] I thought that the point of the ZL2 hood was to accomadate the higher clearance of the 427 with high rise intake, which is why they were standard on all COPO's. My answer was: [ QUOTE ] The L72 motor required no more hood clearance than an L78 equipped Camaro with an SS hood using the standard open element air cleaner. There was no physical size/clearance differences between an L78, L72 or (to the best of my knowledge) a ZL1 motor, so the ZL2 hood (IMO) would not be installed to solve any clearance issues. As far as the car being a COPO - it could be possible. You just know there have to be a few more out there hidden away in buildings or surrounded by vegetation. 
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
