Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Technical & Restoration


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-14-2005, 08:20 AM
ratbox ratbox is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: ca
Posts: 18
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default abnormal spread between block date and body -L_78?

ANYONE. i've had this car for years and always made me scratch my head. and researched earlier owners back 15-20 yrs. always this motor with car. 1969 nova l-78 ss with correct vin stamped block. block casting date- august 68, assembly date- late sept 68. body build- feb 69. any ideas?
anything weird about 69 L-78 nova's that i don't know about, or is it just mine?
Reply With Quote
Click here to view all the pictures posted in this thread...
  #2  
Old 04-14-2005, 11:29 AM
enio45 enio45 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 3,915
Thanks: 313
Thanked 287 Times in 172 Posts
Default Re: abnormal spread between block date and body -L_78?

Very strange however my 68 camaro COPO - non converted yenko car - has trans date code of feb 68, block casting in April, assembly date punched in june and car build date in August. Who would think these cars or parts would be sitting around???
__________________
Eddie M
MBTMF

68 COPO Camaro 9737 non-converted YENKO
69 YENKO SC Camaro, Hugger Orange - born with engine!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-14-2005, 05:48 PM
YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY's Avatar
YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: PA
Posts: 13,097
Thanks: 719
Thanked 352 Times in 142 Posts
Default Re: abnormal spread between block date and body -L_78?

Larger spreads have been documented, if you have the right casting #'s and the vin is on the block, don't worry about it.
__________________
Marlin
70 Yenko Nova-350/360, 4speed M21, 4.10 Posi (Daddy's Ride)
69 SS Nova-396/375hp, 4speed M20, 3.55 Posi (Benjamin's Ride)
67 RS Camaro-327/250hp, 2speed Glide, & 3.08 Open (Danny's Ride)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-15-2005, 06:46 AM
rpoz11 rpoz11 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 699
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: abnormal spread between block date and body -L_78?

Consider that there will be assmebled parts for inventory and these will be pulled as needed, or sent as special orders came. GM , I am certain , would keep X amount of stock in inventory as needed! This is where the dates will move around. Consider that Baby Blue Z28 from Coloardo recently, all the orders placed but parts not in inventory, for example. Even the ZL1 cars lacked parts to meet a predetermined December timeline. But Chevrolet was really crankin' about January, 1969 so many parts could be floating about the assembly plants
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-16-2005, 06:28 AM
Unreal Unreal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Chattanooga, TN, USA
Posts: 1,330
Thanks: 1
Thanked 69 Times in 44 Posts
Default Re: abnormal spread between block date and body -L_78?

I once looked at a 69 L-78 block with an October 68 cast date, and a May 69 engine assembly date. Don't remember the VIN, to estimate the car build date.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-17-2005, 01:54 AM
70-SS/RS-L78 70-SS/RS-L78 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Phila Area
Posts: 579
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Default Re: abnormal spread between block date and body -L_78?

My 1970 L78 engine was built last week of November 69 and the
car was built first week of June 1970.It is the original engine. For
the limited production cars you will often see a this kind of abnormal
time frame.
__________________
Kentucky Gold 70 SS/RS L78.
81 Z/28 Silver/Silver Int
09 G8/GXP #992
98 Pontiac GTP Daytona Pace Car #605
90 Olds Touring Sedan SUPRCHRGD L32
83 El Camino
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-18-2005, 06:57 PM
JRSully JRSully is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Long Island
Posts: 2,341
Thanks: 0
Thanked 330 Times in 158 Posts
Default Re: abnormal spread between block date and body -L_78?

My 70 L78 Nova block has a cast date of A2970 and a build date of 4/24/70 and a car build date of 05B. SULLY
__________________
70 L78 Nova Fathom Blue,Bench, 4spd, F41, 3:55
71 Porsche 911 Targa
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-19-2005, 02:09 AM
TimG TimG is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,148
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1,881 Times in 762 Posts
Default Re: abnormal spread between block date and body -L_78?

Had a '68 435 vette that was a local, one owner car with a casting date of October 67 and a build date of July 68. It was bult in the final days of '68 production and was the original engine. Why a nine month spread? Who knows, but the original local owner sure didn't know anything about restamping an engine in the late 80's when I bought this car. The engine could have been damaged while being put together and sat for weeks and weeks before being repaired.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-20-2005, 12:26 PM
Keith Tedford Keith Tedford is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,695
Thanks: 3
Thanked 55 Times in 12 Posts
Default Re: abnormal spread between block date and body -L_78?

In the old days there was no "just-in-time" delivery. There was a lot of stock stored in the plant. Racks of engines could sit back against the back wall for a long time if the stock wasn't being rotated properly.
__________________
Chevelleless after 46 years......but we did find a low mileage, six speed, silver 2005 Corvette. It will just have to do for now.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.