View Single Post
  #17  
Old 07-19-2018, 12:17 PM
GM Powertrain's Avatar
GM Powertrain GM Powertrain is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Plymouth,Michigan
Posts: 137
Thanks: 93
Thanked 122 Times in 36 Posts
Default

Lee with all due respect I disagree that the '66 442 was a "great distance behind" the '66 GTO. The base 400 that year had 15 horsepower and 9 ft/lbs of torque on the base GTO 389. The L-69 Tri powered 400 cars were every bit the equal of the Tri powered GTO's and the W-30 (yes very rare with only 54 built) had similar if not better performance than the Royal Bobcat cars out of the box. Don't forget the 442 came equipped with a rear sway bar standard for far superior handling while John Delorean didn't find it necessary on the GTO. The cars were not marketed and promoted like the GTO's were so sales lagged behind. The styling and interiors were better IMO on the Pontiac but all in all the 442 for '66 was every bit the GTO's equal that year. Just my .02..


Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee Stewart View Post
As you stated . . . not to compete with the brand new 1966 Chevelle SS396. The Muscle Car Wars were just getting up steam for the model year 1966. And it was all about big block engines with lots of horsepower and torque.

Both Chrysler and Ford really weren't contenders yet - they would get serious the following model year (at least Chrysler would. Ford waited until 1968). Pontiac lead the way with the GTO followed by (a great distance behind) Olds with the 442.

The accepted definition of a Muscle Car is a big engine in an intermediate sized car. Chevy put it's toe in the water so to speak with the 1965 SS396 Malibu - to get media and dealer reaction- all very positive.

Chevy knew it had a great engine with the L79. But marketing felt that big blocks were where the Muscle Car sales would be . . . and they were correct. If you wanted handling and a Muscle Car, the L79 would be a great choice as we all know that big block cars are nose heavy. But at the same time you had to give up many of the features that became standard on a Muscle Car like hood treatment, stripes, redline tires and badges.



The 1967 model year, for Chevrolet, was all about the brand new Camaro. Chevy wasn't going to offer any models that would compete with it if they could help it. So the Nova SS got a max engine of 275 hp, the full size Chevrolet had a single 427, the 385 hp engine. They couldn't cripple the Chevelle like they did those cars (though Chevy did hold back the L78 option for most of the model year) because sales were way up as were sales of the GTO which Chevy looked at as it's main competitor.

Small block Muscle Cars only became popular when the insurance companies started raising the premiums on BB Muscle Cars into the stratosphere.

AFAIK the L79 was never an option on the 1967 Nova SS. At least a published option. How those handful of cars made it out of the factory - I don't know.
__________________
1971 Nova SS BBC and 3 Pedals

1987 Buick Turbo T ex GM High Tech Performance Magazine project car
10.45 @ 128.71

'87 Buick Regal Turbo T Stock 48,000 miles

2015 Challenger SRT Hellcat 5400 miles

2014 F150 Supercab Ecoboost - Livernois Motorsports tuned


Formers: '67,69 and '73 SS Chevelles
'65 Biscayne 427
'66 Caprice 396
'72 LeMans Y code 455 VIN 007
6 GN and Turbo T's, 2 Wildcats, GS, 2 Skylarks ...and a partridge in a pear tree.
Reply With Quote