View Single Post
  #25  
Old 07-25-2019, 11:01 PM
69LM1's Avatar
69LM1 69LM1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 2,546
Thanks: 369
Thanked 341 Times in 160 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EZ Nova View Post
From the guys own website, he has 24 yrs of doing this. So therefore misrepresenting this Camaro as an SS, would this not also constitute fraud charges over the VIN issues as well.
Good catch EZNova, Mark have that website copied or just do some simple screenshots of these claims before they make any changes. This would go to the dealer "knew or should have known" portion of any legal action an attorney will write. Copy anything that brags about his knowledge of cars, restoring cars and can show his expertise. This should lay a foundation for the attorney to write the suit.

Also, the attorney (and I also recommend the lawyer here) will have to be familiar with VINs and ConVins and lemon laws of that state as well as federal statutes (since it passed state lines).

Finally, the dealer may (should) have liability insurance for these things, and a lawyer will be able to negotiate with them direct and even if the dealership does not want to settle they (the insurance) might rather than have to have a duty to defend on a costly suit.

My .02,

/Rich
__________________
Rich Pern
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 69LM1 For This Useful Post:
purple panther (08-01-2019)