[Late BrakeU2]

That's certainly the right mindset but the problem with burden of proof is just that.Ain't a court in the land that could convict the seller of that car based on evidence.You could hire Jerry for expert camaro testimony but last time I checked there wasn't anyone making a tidy sum flying across the country representing burned Chevelle buyers.The time is quickly approaching that there will be no way to de bunk a restored car one way or the other-once that happens it's not a stretch to see overall interest(let alone valuations)suffer as a result.Counterfitters have been getting free tuition through TC and this site,there most likely will never be a PHS equivalent for these cars,it's open season,and they're springin up like daisys.Some of the foremost authorities on these are members here-they already know not to disseminate build sheets and specific production info but it's incumbent on everyone for the good of the hobby($?)to PM sensitive info. Some may laugh at that notion but cleary the fox is in the coop(or coupe in our case)and he goin to do some damage.If I didn't own one of these I would not be on my soapbox but given the circumstances it's pretty fertile ground for the disingenuous.This thread was a fishing expedition,nothing more.
jmho