Re: 1969 Camaro double COPO (ebay)
Charlie, isn't BE for a heavy duty positraction 4.10 rear and BV for a standard duty positraction 4.10 rear, even in Camaros? Bob F. up here has a '69 L78 car with a BV rearend in it. It seems to have a correct drivetrain with all the date codes falling into the right timeframes. (I spent an hour or two going over the car for an appraisal a couple of weeks before he bought it). I thought all COPO's were BE. If the pop says "BV", would that make this suspicious, or just another exception to the rule?
Oh, yeah, as for the above BE stamped rear, I'll go on record saying I've NEVER seen a rearend stamped that deep, that evenly spaced, or that easy to read.
|