View Single Post
  #37149  
Old 10-22-2023, 03:04 PM
Lynn Lynn is online now
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 7,056
Thanks: 34
Thanked 2,641 Times in 1,200 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee Stewart View Post
Considering it had a Chevy engine by 1965 (although the Studebaker hardliners insist it was not a Chevy, it was McKinnon engine!) it was pretty easy to use the existing K66 parts developed for the Corvette the year before.

Don't get me wrong; Studebaker had some great low cost innovations over the years; like a lock up torque converter in my 53. GM didn't use a lock up TQ until the 80s. But by 1965 the grave was already being dug for the Studebaker autos.
__________________
Don't believe everything you read on the internet ... Ben Franklin
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Lynn For This Useful Post:
67 Nova Boy (10-22-2023), dykstra (10-22-2023), Lee Stewart (10-22-2023), markinnaples (10-22-2023), olredalert (10-22-2023), YenkoYS-199Stinger (10-23-2023)