Thread: You Can't Make This Stuff Up!
View Single Post
  #37149  
Old 10-22-2023, 03:04 PM
Lynn Lynn is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 7,727
Thanks: 88
Thanked 3,544 Times in 1,497 Posts
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee Stewart View Post
Considering it had a Chevy engine by 1965 (although the Studebaker hardliners insist it was not a Chevy, it was McKinnon engine!) it was pretty easy to use the existing K66 parts developed for the Corvette the year before.

Don't get me wrong; Studebaker had some great low cost innovations over the years; like a lock up torque converter in my 53. GM didn't use a lock up TQ until the 80s. But by 1965 the grave was already being dug for the Studebaker autos.
__________________
Don't believe everything you read on the internet ... Ben Franklin
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Lynn For This Useful Post:
67 Nova Boy (10-22-2023), dykstra (10-22-2023), Lee Stewart (10-22-2023), markinnaples (10-22-2023), olredalert (10-22-2023), YenkoYS-199Stinger (10-23-2023)