View Single Post
  #3  
Old 10-06-2022, 05:13 PM
tom406 tom406 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Newcastle, WA USA
Posts: 2,106
Thanks: 379
Thanked 3,324 Times in 723 Posts
Default

After some discussion on a Corvette Forum and some more investigation, I’m now of the thought that this is more likely an old restoration restamp that is a very good approximation of a late ‘60 build, but is not accurate for what was happening earlier in the model year for a couple of reasons. It was pointed out that Flint engine assembly wasn’t using zeros in their month stampings during calendar year 1959 (a commenter said it changed during January 1960). I found a July ‘59 283 on Ebay that shows a “7” instead of an “07” on the assembly stamping which supports that. The first hand stamped serial numbers on 1960 Corvettes appear to use a larger, more stylized font stamping as you can see on #2949. A gang stamp was later used, and I’ve been using #9668 as an example of a good stamping, since it is from a car that was said to be in the man’s family since 1962 and everyone who looked at the picture seemed to agree it was correct. As far as why a 30 year old build of a ‘57 Chevy would have a restamped block, the car also had a ‘59 Rochester FI unit on it, so whoever put it together was likely familiar with and traded in the arena of early Corvette engines and parts.
Attached Images
   

Last edited by tom406; 10-06-2022 at 05:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to tom406 For This Useful Post:
PeteLeathersac (10-07-2022)