View Single Post
  #28898  
Old 04-07-2022, 01:59 PM
LT1vette LT1vette is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 538
Thanks: 1,772
Thanked 441 Times in 216 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee Stewart View Post
The Muscle Car Era was ALL about who was buying cars . . . the Younger Generation. These buyers were new. That's why the companies rushed to put out muscle cars - to capture these brand new kind of buyers.

Prior to 1964 you could get high performance engines in cars. 413, 406, 409 with dual quads or tri-power. But those weren't "Muscle Cars."

You had to have a hood treatment, Redline tires, chrome exhaust tips, lots of badges and most important - a catchy name. GTO, 442, Super Sport, GT and R/T. It was ALL about marketing.

You're father bought an Impala. You wanted a Camaro.

1967 was a watershed year for Muscle Cars. More new models were added - more than any other year prior to or after.

Sure - a 1966 L72 427 Biscayne could probably beat 90% of all the Muscle Cars on the Street. Who cared? It looked like Mom's Grocery Getter!

And that's why BB full size cars didn't sell.
Lee...Good analysis. we're on the same page now. I didn't see that "angle". But that is correct, those were the start up years for Pony cars.

Thanks
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to LT1vette For This Useful Post:
Lee Stewart (04-07-2022)