View Single Post
  #12  
Old 02-18-2022, 05:15 PM
Kurt S Kurt S is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 3,113
Thanks: 2
Thanked 836 Times in 381 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by luzl78 View Post
Early Camaro’s used the one piece therefore the March revision.
I agree. The lower knob was added to the AIM in March in 3 illustrations.
But it's confusing - 3895201 was replaced, but by the same number. 3895201 and 3895202 were in the early parts manuals, and then 3895201 was used with the 2-piece system.

My question is: if the early knobs were one piece, how did they lock them into the right orientation for the shift pattern?
__________________
Kurt S - CRG
Reply With Quote