[Tracker1]

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Xplantdad</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 442w30</div><div class="ubbcode-body">It bothers me that a &quot;legit&quot; auctioneer like R&amp;S don't care about the integrity of the descriptions provided by the sellers. I understand the law doesn't suggest they should, <span style="font-weight: bold">but it certainly doesn't help the hobby to practically support sketchiness.</span> </div></div>

A bit of a stretch, don't you think? [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/rolleyes.gif[/img] It's not the auctions business to &quot;check&quot; every car that comes up for auction. The auction is provided a write up from the owner. If you want a car checked out, there are people and services for that. And-a buyer should be an educated buyer. An auctions business is to make money, plain and simple. After all, the auction didn't build the FAKE car....

BY the way, this car sold for $30,930.00 </div></div>

I don't know Bruce. There's somewhere in the middle isn't there? Every auction house out there knows this site or someone on it. I am willing to bet when that fake L89 black '69 Camaro went over the block someone was well-versed in what was said about the car on here...and still let it go through to the tune of 200K. That strikes me as wrong. It is a moral dilemma above all.

30K is definitely not '68 RAII GTO money. But it is more than clone '68 goats change hands for on any given day