The Supercar Registry

The Supercar Registry (https://www.yenko.net/forum/index.php)
-   Technical & Restoration (https://www.yenko.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=86)
-   -   409 turbo fire? (https://www.yenko.net/forum/showthread.php?t=90394)

396/425blr 01-16-2007 05:24 AM

409 turbo fire?
 
i have kicked this question around before on other boards, not sure there is a solid answer? why did chevrolet label the 61-65 409 as a turbo-fire. that was the logo for the small block engines. 348/turbo-thrust, 396-454 turbo-jet and so on..... in the early 62 shop manual i think it was labeled turbo-torque, but it never was used in production. anyone know why it came to be a turbo-fire? https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...lins/dunno.gif dennis

Verne_Frantz 01-16-2007 08:18 AM

Re: 409 turbo fire?
 
Good question Dennis, and I really don't have the answer. Just a marketing decision I guess which deviated from the previous methodology.
The standard 2bbl 283 was known as the Turbo-Fire unless a 4bbl version (pre-'62) was ordered, and then it was a Super Turbo-Fire. The carburetion difference added the "Super". The 348 "W" engines were Turbo-Thrust in their basic form, and then with 3x2s added, they became "Super" Turbo Thrust. The "Super" was also used on the 305hp hi-perf engine with an AFB carburetor (although still with a hydraulic cam). With the addition of a "special" cam, (meaning solid lifter) they became Turbo-Thrust Special. And in the case of a tri-power solid lifter 348, they were known as the combination "Super Turbo-Thrust Special". Now, that's a big name to throw on an engine.. So "Super" meant a carburetion upgrade while "Special" meant a cam upgrade.
In '61 when the first 409 was introduced, it was simply called "409 cubic inch engine", with no "name" what-so-ever.
In '62 (for whatever reason) Chevrolet reverted back to the Turbo-Fire name for both 409s (380hp & 409hp). Even in '63, all 3 engines, including the 340hp hydraulic lifter engines were only called Turbo-Fire. Who knows why????
In Chevrolet's published introduction of the new '62 models, they stated, "The name Turbo-Fire is applied to all 1962 Passenger Car V-8 engines and on the rocker cover decals it is followed by the engine displacement figures". That's it. They dropped the individual names for each engine.

Verne https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...mlins/grin.gif

JoeG 01-16-2007 09:27 AM

Re: 409 turbo fire?
 
Toss of the coin............

PeteLeathersac 01-16-2007 07:11 PM

Re: 409 turbo fire?
 
Cool stuff Verne...love the differences between Super & Special! .

If they simply decided to choose only one because the long names were getting to be a mouthful (and air ceaner lids already big enough), Turbo-Fire surely was the best choice! .

Gets me wondering what year the Chevy powered Canadian Pontiac 'Astro series' monikers appeared? .

~ Pete
https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...mlins/grin.gif

x Baldwin Motion 01-17-2007 03:25 AM

Re: 409 turbo fire?
 
Verne...priceless info https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...iggthumpup.gif

Belair62 01-26-2007 07:28 PM

Re: 409 turbo fire?
 
Thats because he is Verne !!!


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.


O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.