'69 RS/SS Camaro
 

Interesting car claiming to be a #s L78. What do you folks think about the partial VIN?

Link to 1969 Camaro auction

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/UOEAA...Lb/s-l1600.jpg

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/wnwAA...La/s-l1600.jpg

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/D4MAA...IS/s-l1600.jpg

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/31EAA...JB/s-l1600.jpg

I've never seen one that easy to read, especially after paint...Joe

I would have to agree on the partial. I dont like either stamping, pad or partial.

Front stripe is not correct either.:scholar:

124379n543170

Sold at Mecum Monterey in August 2019 for $61,050

Nah pretty confident it is a restamp. RUN

Car is an 11c. Was Norwood stamping VIN in that location in that time frame?....Joe

Nice car, but I wouldn't spend L78 money for it. That VIN stamp is weird - the picture almost makes it look like the numbers are raised. I had to look at it a couple of times.


Yeah, the stripe screwup is seriously messing with my OCD.

Also, maybe push that driver's headlight door all the way closed before you take the picture! :rolleyes2:

6-8 tach? Looks much newer than speedo face.

The partial vin should be on the deck in that time frame, also tach and gauge car with no clock