The Supercar Registry - Is "stance" important?

The Supercar Registry (https://www.yenko.net/forum/index.php)

- Supercar/Musclecar Discussion (https://www.yenko.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=79)

- - Is "stance" important? (https://www.yenko.net/forum/showthread.php?t=121950)

Re: Is "stance" important?

<span style="font-size: 14pt">Sammy's is <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="font-style: italic">bad boy</span></span> all the way................. [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/headbang.gif[/img]</span>

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...C5D872FA80.jpg

Re: Is "stance" important?

http://i65.photobucket.com/albums/h2...ly62008004.jpg

And you can bet that after seeing this thread mine will be sportin Cragar's this summer!

Re: Is "stance" important?

Y'know what had a good stance? That 1971 Hemi Challenger R/T with the N94 hood that was at the entrance at MCACN.

Re: Is "stance" important?

<span style="font-size: 17pt">Another Mopar that has it going on!!........................</span>

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...598D77FFDA.jpg

Re: Is "stance" important?

<span style="font-size: 17pt">Grady's: One of <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="font-style: italic">THE</span></span> best (be still, my heart)!!!!!!!!!!!!....................</span>

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...2/image-53.jpg

Re: Is "stance" important?

<span style="font-size: 17pt">Great topic Jeff! This one (Mark M's former BM) is <span style="font-style: italic"><span style="font-weight: bold">wicked</span></span>!...............</span>

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...llePROF023.jpg

Re: Is "stance" important?

<span style="font-size: 17pt">Speaking of "Baldwin Motion"s AND Mark AND great stances .................</span>

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...alrealgood.jpg

Re: Is "stance" important?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: ZiggyL78</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I don't see it as being lower Dan.The rocker looks horizontal to the ground.If you make a print of your pic and draw a line through the centres of the wheels and the bottom of the rocker,you will find the lines are parallel.I think if you measure the front of the rocker and compare it to the back,they will be very close.
I always remember back in 70 that when my LS6 was loaded for the track that the back went down.2 slicks on steel wheels with a tool box and a 24 of "50" was too much for stock springs.:)

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: XXXBlackLs6M22</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Stance is important to get it right if you are going for the original height on a 1970 Chevelle SS. The back was always lower than the front [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/biggthumpup.gif[/img] </div></div> </div></div>

Ken my car is about 3/4" lower in the back. If you take a close look at that photo you can clearly see the shadow line sitting on each tire is much lower on the back then the front. Thats how the 70 Chevelle came from the factory.