The Supercar Registry

The Supercar Registry (https://www.yenko.net/forum/index.php)
-   Ebay & other seen ads section (https://www.yenko.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=139)
-   -   '68 Z/28 with Window Sticker, VV Cooke Sold (https://www.yenko.net/forum/showthread.php?t=160400)

scuncio 04-05-2020 01:55 AM

'68 Z/28 with Window Sticker, VV Cooke Sold
 
This one became pretty interesting to me when I read in the description that the seller had the original window sticker (which, strangely, wasn't pictured in the auction). Imagine my surprise when the seller texted me a few pics that revealed this car was sold new at VV Cooke, and came with a bunch of nice options. Looking at the car now, I probably wouldn't have given it a second look....

Link to 1968 VV Cooke Z/28 auction

https://photos.smugmug.com/SYc-Site/...E4B21AC-X2.jpg

https://photos.smugmug.com/SYc-Site/...2557A10-X2.jpg

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/y0QAA...By/s-l1600.jpg

124378N393393

ZLP955 04-05-2020 10:03 AM

Unusual RPO order

scott s 04-05-2020 12:45 PM

Man everything else on that car is wrong or repo but still has the orig window sticker?I would like to know that back story....

scuncio 04-05-2020 02:00 PM

Yeah, I know it - I talked to the owner for a while yesterday and it was clear he didn’t know much about it (bought it as part of an estate lot). He did think the trans was original FWIW.

Jonesy 04-05-2020 02:15 PM

Is that window sticker even legit? I have my doubts.

scott s 04-06-2020 12:21 AM

Was waiting for someone to chime in on that window sticker to see if its legit..

1967Z28 04-06-2020 01:45 AM

Not legit.

scuncio 04-06-2020 02:22 AM

Well that's icing on the cake. I'm wondering why someone would go to that length to fake a window sticker for *this* car.

ZLP955 04-06-2020 09:55 AM

Re-reading my first reply, I could've been clearer; meant the order of the RPOs on that WS was unusual (and therefore suspect), not that the car was ordered with unusual combination of RPOs.

Keith Seymore 04-06-2020 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZLP955 (Post 1492648)
Re-reading my first reply, I could've been clearer; meant the order of the RPOs on that WS was unusual (and therefore suspect), not that the car was ordered with unusual combination of RPOs.

That was what I took away from your comment.

K


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.


O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.