This is exactly what makes this site great. Conversation. opinions and dialogue. For the record, I'm an old school guy too.



I can't say I completely agree with "they don't appreciate the cars for what they represent of history" as a blanket statement. (I don't believe that is how it was intended) because I do know of many "Restomod" owners who wholeheartedly do so, but I understand what you are saying. :biggthumpup:


JP

That's the great thing about this hobby. There is something for everyone. Pure Stock, Day 2 Modified, Restomod . . . whatever floats your boat.

Yes, there's something for everyone!


Some of the folks who have been around a while...and lived through adjusting solid lifters, endless carb rebuilds, etc now prefer their muscle with modern technology...that runs flawlessly, gets way better gas mileage and has way better performance.



Why can't you have the best of both worlds?



Take for example Ken Tibor's 66. He's put over 33,000 miles on it since completion and driven it from coast to coast. I dare say there's not many folks with original drivetrain factory muscle that will do that. I do know a few that do, but they are the exception. Ken has the best of both worlds...the looks of a classic and the reliability of new tech!


https://www.lsxmag.com/news/the-blue...-by-ken-tibor/




I think that muscle cars should be driven, which is why my 66 Chevelle got 28,000 miles put on it in the five years I owned it...in the rain, too!





https://www.yenko.net/forum/cache.ph...n_DSCF6664.jpg

https://www.yenko.net/forum/cache.ph...n_DSCF3530.jpg



https://www.yenko.net/forum/cache.ph...n_DSCF6669.jpg

https://www.yenko.net/forum/cache.ph...n_DSCF6670.jpg

Taking this a step further...I doubt that there are many here still running Windows 3.1, or Windows 95.



New and better (well, it's supposed to be better...LOL) tech has come out...and people have moved forward with the new "engine" for their computers :) :beers:

Not to mention all the people who are on the "zero emissions" bandwagon. Uh, do the batteries recharge themselves ?? Doesn't the process of making electricity create emissions ?

I would LOVE to still be using my Windows 95 Pro edition. I hate windows 10 and I don't see that it offers that much more technology, except to be information invasive in the background. Yeah, there are a lot more toys and programs, but nothing that I use.

I guess I'm just too old because I would never consider owning or driving a classic car with electric power. LS engines in older cars don't interest me either.

I love the look, sounds, vibrations and smells of my Chevelle as it was intended to be. It's not the fastest car around and it sure doesn't get good gas mileage, but I get a thrill each time I fire it up, let the clutch out and drive it down the street. :burnout:

Interesting topic. I wouldn't rule it out. I've thought about what I'd do if gas wasn't available anymore and if I'd operate my Camaro's as electric. If so, I'm certain it would not be as enjoyable. I enjoy operating the machine on four wheels in real time with no computer influence over my inputs. The sounds, smells, rattles make the experience. Wouldn't be the same totally clean and silent. Can't argue with the torque though. However, a 69 RS/SS with an electric motor is like an Armani suit on a mannequin.

:haha::haha::haha:

In a future perfect world - no emissions. Power is generated by Wind Farms, Solar Panel Farms and Ocean Wave Generators.