The Supercar Registry

The Supercar Registry (https://www.yenko.net/forum/index.php)
-   Ebay & other seen ads section (https://www.yenko.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=139)
-   -   Donnybrooke Green '70 #s LT-1 Corvette Convertible (https://www.yenko.net/forum/showthread.php?t=183298)

napa68 09-01-2025 02:08 PM

Ooooooffdah!

olredalert 09-01-2025 09:28 PM

----Tony,,,I got the same message. Someone got the deal of the year! I never saw the pad....Bill S

scuncio 09-01-2025 10:27 PM

Anyone from the site get it?

Tracker1 09-04-2025 01:05 PM

CTV suffix code wow, a ZR1 vert hiding in plain site. Jeez.

tom406 09-04-2025 02:47 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Here’s the stamp pad of a car built 6 units later. This serial number stamping is what I would consider typical for 1970 production.

Mr70 09-04-2025 06:47 PM

This from the Green/Green LT-1 seller:
Hi,we did have the car inspected and confirmed it was not a real ZR-1 and we are of the opinion it was re-stamped when it was restored as was the inspector.A very nice Stingray for sure,but it's not a real ZR-1.We had the Stingray inspected by an independent Classic car Appraiser who is very knowledgeable.Beyond the engine stampings,there are other indicators that this Corvette is not a ZR-1.ZR-1's did not have radios or shielding on the ignition wires or an antenna.This car has a radio,and you see where the hole for the antenna mount was filled in and painted over.
The M21 transmission,came from a '69 Nova and the rear end date codes are not correct.
It's missing some options/features that a ZR-1 would have.
It does have the right Block stampings and overall,a very nicely restored Stingray which drives exceptionally well and had the performance of a ZR-1,but without any historical data from Chevrolet to prove otherwise,it's not a ZR-1 in our opinion.
The buyer did collect the car,and as far as I know the car is still in our local area.


Kind regards,
David Bruski

Lynn 09-04-2025 11:11 PM

I was going to say restamp.

While on this topic; I know there are significant differences between a "plain" LT-1 and a ZR1 such as brakes, suspension and mandatory M22.

I have never been able to find a definitive answer on what would be different in the engine. There has to some difference to warrant a different engine code. And it can't just be the M22.

markjohnson 09-04-2025 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lynn (Post 1678785)
I was going to say restamp.

While on this topic; I know there are significant differences between a "plain" LT-1 and a ZR1 such as brakes, suspension and mandatory M22.

I have never been able to find a definitive answer on what would be different in the engine. There has to some difference to warrant a different engine code. And it can't just be the M22.

I’ve always wondered this exact thing. Maybe GM snuck the Off-Road camshaft into the LT1!

TimG 09-05-2025 12:41 AM

1 Attachment(s)
One difference is the clutch diameter. It's not unusual to see an LT1 assembly code ground and restamped as a ZR1 by changing out the clutch. I looked at a 1972 ZR1 that was prepared this way, no ZR1 engines, grind and restamp the LT1 code and change the clutch.

Lynn 09-05-2025 02:35 AM

So did the ZR1 use a 403 bell housing with 10.5 clutch. I know my LT-1 has 621 bell housing with 11 inch clutch.

Another member suggested it may be no ignition wire shielding because the ZR1 did not offer a radio.

Can anyone confirm?


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.


O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.